Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
The failure of Operation Metro Surge to meet the exacting standards of professional law enforcement is evident on our television and computer screens on a daily basis. Constitutional and effective public safety bears no relation to what we are witnessing today, with now two local citizens shot and killed and others torn from their homes and cars needlessly. As a longtime law enforcement leader, I have been plagued by the question of how Minnesota got to this point. As a former U.S. Attorney, I bring my own perspective.
U.S. Attorneys are appointed by the president to work collaboratively with local, state and federal law enforcement to address the primary public safety challenges facing their community, and then to implement strategies to address those challenges. Across Republican and Democratic administrations, this mandate was driven by local priorities, local challenges and local needs. Until now.
When I returned to office in 2022, law enforcement and I concluded that Minnesota faced three overarching challenges: unprecedented levels of violent crime, rampant fentanyl trafficking and a massive scheme to defraud state government programs. We addressed each of these challenges collaboratively, with effective and professional strategies, prosecuting 100 gang members, 70 Feeding Our Future defendants and hundreds of dangerous drug dealers and career offenders. We marshaled our resources and served the best interests of our state, with homegrown solutions executed aggressively, fairly and within the bounds of the law.
In each instance, we started with lists of potential defendants we believed were responsible for the violence, drug dealing and fraud plaguing Minnesota, and built cases against them. Once we had cases ready to prosecute, we obtained warrants from federal judges, and the FBI, ATF and DEA brought in expert high-risk arrest teams to make seamless and safe arrests. Violent offenders, almost all of whom were citizens, were arrested in large numbers without anyone getting hurt and without violating anyone’s rights. Until recently, this orderly and professional approach was the norm for federal law enforcement in Minnesota.
When I left government in January 2025, the new administration continued to make progress on these Minnesota priorities and challenges, charging more defendants in the massive fraud scheme, more violent criminals and more large-scale drug dealers. In the summer of 2025, long after I had left, the U.S. Attorney’s office worked closely with local, state and federal law enforcement to bring charges in the assassination of the former Minnesota House speaker and her husband, and stood shoulder to shoulder with investigators after the shooting at Annunciation Church. In the face of tragedy, we were proud of our prosecutors and investigators and their ability to work together.
Today, all of that has changed. Operation Metro Surge conceived by officials in Washington, D.C., not Minnesota, has pitted federal law enforcement against our neighbors, and torn apart the once solid local-federal collaboration. Jettisoning the priorities that were built on a local consensus, the D.C. creators of Operation Metro Surge have sold a false narrative that Minnesota is suffering from a violent illegal immigrant crime wave. We are not.