Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
As America continues to suffer from gun violence and mass shootings, it has been well established that it is best to limit the amount of notoriety and infamy of the shooters by restricting the use of their name and image.
That’s why I was disturbed to see the Minnesota Star Tribune give so much airtime to the alleged assassin of Mark and Melissa Hortman in the article, “Assassinations place [the suspect’s] religion in the spotlight.” The article largely serves the suspect and the religion he spent so much time evangelizing, effectively proselytizing and spreading the fringe worldview further than he ever could have alone.
I understand the impulse to want to dissect the motives of someone accused of committing such a heinous act. We all want answers, but articles like this are absolutely the wrong way to go about it.
What I saw were several quotes that allowed his colleagues to spin this political assassination as something with deeper meaning or as less of a tragedy. One person is quoted as saying that night was a miracle because there weren’t more victims. Another said, “‘I think something else is going on here. ... He is someone who has a story to tell.”’
Why is the Star Tribune boosting the story of the suspect, even trying to paint him as sympathetic? This fails to serve our state and is a slap on the face to the survivors and to those of us who knew and loved Melissa and Mark.
To top it all off, the Star Tribune allowed the suspect to manipulate the story, providing him power when it quoted him as saying, “I’ll answer your last question after I see how you report the information I have given you so far.” The Star Tribune played right into his hands, effectively holding a megaphone up to him.