In the days of pre-internet capitalism, the troubles of one dominant company in an industry tended to be good news for its rivals.
In today’s hyperconnected world, a threatened ban by Western governments of Huawei, the Chinese market leader in telecoms gear, is also a worry for its competitors.
Both Ericsson, a Swedish company, and Nokia, a Finnish one, would prefer the geopolitical saga to end, the better to focus on competing for contracts related to the launch of super-speedy “fifth generation” (5G) mobile-phone networks.
The U.S. government is not letting up its campaign to persuade allies to freeze Huawei out of 5G tenders. It worries that Huawei’s equipment may contain “back doors” — deliberate security flaws inserted to allow Chinese spies to eavesdrop on, or attack, phone networks.
Earlier this month, in a letter to Germany’s economics minister, America’s envoy to Berlin, Richard Grenell, threatened to cut back U.S. cooperation with German security agencies if the country allowed Huawei or other Chinese firms to participate in the rollout of 5G. U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo suggested in Hungary recently that doing business with Huawei could tip decisions on where America stations troops.
So far Britain and Germany, among others, have not yielded to U.S. demands. Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, said on March 19 that she does not believe in excluding a company from the German market “simply because it’s from a certain country,” though a final decision is pending.
Even if the U.S. prevailed in Europe, as it has in Australia and Japan, Ericsson and Nokia are unlikely to win back much of the market they have lost in recent years.
Between 2015 and 2018 Huawei’s share rose from 24 percent to 28 percent; Nokia’s dipped from 20 percent to 17 percent and Ericsson’s from 15 percent to 13 percent. An escalation in the war on Huawei might prompt Beijing to retaliate by kicking Western firms out of China.
That would be a blow to the Nordic duo. China accounted for 10 percent of Ericsson’s 211 billion krona ($24.2 billion) in global sales last year.
Nokia derives a similar share of revenue from the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Extra sales in Europe in the event of a Huawei ban would not offset losses in China, argues Pierre Ferragu of New Street Research, not least because the Chinese will launch 5G a year or two earlier.
More important, worries Börje Ekholm, chief executive of Ericsson, a ban on Huawei would slow down the launch of 5G in Europe. The continent is already lagging three to four years behind the U.S. in 4G, the current generation of wireless technology, he says.
Uncertainty over regulation, pricing and how to deal with Huawei, is likely to slow Europe down further.
The specter of a Huawei ban is putting a damper on Germany’s auction for 5G mobile spectrum that kicked off this month. All four bidders already make extensive use of Huawei hardware, such as antennae or routers.
Upgrading to 5G will require splurging on new equipment. Huawei wants to be one of their principal suppliers (though it may first need to meet more stringent security requirements which the German government is mulling).
Though it is possible to ban Huawei completely from Europe, its biggest market outside of China, industry insiders warn that it would be hugely complex and costly. It would be especially disruptive in countries where Huawei is deeply embedded, such as Italy, Poland and Britain, says Stéphane Téral of IHS Markit, a research firm.
With only a hint of hyperbole, Bengt Nordstrom of Northstream, a consulting firm, likens the resulting shock to the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008. Most of Europe’s roughly 200 operators of mobile networks use Huawei’s 4G gear.
Asked whether talk of a Huawei ban had any effect on the order books of Ericsson, Ekholm responded, “The candid answer is no.”
Recently, TDC, Denmark’s biggest telecoms firm, confirmed that it was leaning toward Ericsson over Huawei, its current equipment-maker, to build its 5G network. That deal, though, was struck before any concerns over Huawei were ever aired. So far, the entire controversy has been a headache for Ekholm and his counterpart at Nokia, not a gift.