aMAILia BAG is a weekly installment on this blog where you send me questions (to @AmeliaRayno on Twitter or amelia.rayno@startribune.com) and I answer them here. Questions below are in bold, while my responses are in regular type.
Amelia, I have a theory I want you to shoot down:
Even though the Big Ten is supposedly a superior conference this year, I wouldn't be surprised if they don't do that well in the NCAA's. When Big Ten teams come into conference play, most of them were filled with confidence after basically steam rolling competition from somewhat equal (ACC) and lesser or much lesser competition. In the Big Ten, I've seen many teams (not just the Gophers) lose that "swagger". Illinois, which pounded now #1 Illinois on the road and beat Butler, went into a swoon after losing at home to the Gophs. Even Indiana and Michigan lately seem to be playing with less confidence and much tighter. The 3's aren't falling like before (just ask Stauskus from Michigan) and teams aren't running as much.
On our own team, Austin Hollins (who hit five 3's in a row against Northwestern at home) can't buy a basket, Coleman views anything beyond a dunk as daunting, and Rodney Williams looks like a freshman again. Yet these same three looked like world beaters against "normal" competition in the NIT last year.
Do you think the difficulty of this conference---and what it does to the teams' collective confidence--- might hurt its results come NCAA time? It seems like a few years ago when the Big East was considered the dominant conference most of their teams went out early.
Jeff King
Cary, NC
That you're talking about confidence is a real giveaway that you're a Gophers fan.
I mean, sure, you could definitely make the argument that these teams are exhausted and that will impact them in the play-offs – but I just don't think confidence is an issue for Michigan, Michigan State, Indiana, Wisconsin – the teams I could see really making a run.
When you talk about threes not falling, teams struggling more and running less – well, that's just the wear-and-tear of a long and tough conference season. Shooters go through slumps. Struggles are expected to be highlighted in Big Ten play – anyone who didn't see them coming hadn't taken a very good look at the league this year. And it's hard to run much in the Big Ten because there are so many teams that are defense-oriented and enough that consciously work to slow it down. I remember at the end of the non-conference schedule someone asking Wisconsin's coach Bo Ryan whether he thought teams were running more this year. He chuckled and said something to the effect of 'Just wait 'til January.'
That said, I don't think any of that will make Big Ten teams inherently weaker than other conference teams – au contraire, I think they will be much stronger because of it. Other teams that are in weaker conferences never had that wakeup call that Big Ten teams did. They're still cruising through a non-conference-like schedule (see Memphis). A lot of them have never been forced to play in the half court, forced to see what happens when an opponent denies them the run. They haven't had to adjust against such good, and varied, defenses. They haven't had as many fatal flaws exposed, and so perhaps haven't fixed them (remember the Gophers in the non-conference schedule? They were racking up turnovers like crazy, but no one really cared that much because they were winning).