Since news broke that MLB and the players have agreed to a new CBA, I've seen nothing but praise for the decision to rob the All-Star game of the power to decide home-field advantage for the World Series.
I get it. It was always an illogical arrangement.
But I'll defend the odd, now-defunct rule in a couple of ways.
Baseball still has the only All-Star game that matters, that looks something like the sport it is designed to celebrate. It is the only All-Star game among the major sports where the defense is fully engaged and competitive.
During the '90s and early 2000s, when I covered an All-Star game you could see and hear players plotting their early exit. They would leave after the fourth or fifth inning if they could to catch a flight. Their attitudes made the game feel meaningless.
Attached World Series home-field advantage changed that, gave the players reason to care about the outcome, instilled peer pressure from teams hopeful of making the World Series.
And because home-field advantage only truly gives an advantage to the "home" team if the series reaches seven games, it rarely proved decisive.
Only once since 2002 has the home team won a Game 7 in the World Series - in 2011, when the Cardinals won in St. Louis.