Word this week that Apple Inc. has given up trying to make a TV put one of its most prominent financial analysts, Gene Munster of Minneapolis-based Piper Jaffray & Co., in an awkward spot.
Munster first told Apple investors and the media in 2009 that the company was working on a TV and predicted it would emerge in 2010 or 2011. When no TV emerged, he stuck to the prediction, sliding the date but remaining confident in what his research was showing.
His adherence, and the criticism he took from some investors and journalists as the years wore on, became emblematic of the insatiable desire to know what's coming next from Apple specifically and in high tech generally.
By bursting the speculation about its TV, Apple signaled something else to watch in the high-tech world. It is that, after several decades in which advances were cataloged by the arrival of a new gadget such as the PC or the smartphone, the proverbial next big thing is less likely to be a single device than a confluence of changes across a broad range of products from cars to garage doors, washing machines to bathroom lamps.
On Monday, just hours after the high-profile activist investor Carl Icahn released a letter predicting an Apple TV set would be released next year, the Wall Street Journal published a story that, citing sources at Apple, said the company gave up the project more than a year ago.
The following day, Munster did something rare for a Wall Street analyst: he owned up to his mistake with clients and investors.
"Our latest thinking prior to this story was that Apple would launch a television in 2016," he wrote in a report to investors. "Based on this report, we no longer expected a television to launch indefinitely."
The Journal report said Apple had been working on a TV set for nearly a decade, before Munster first disclosed it, and confirmed some of the details he previously told investors.