After hearing from dozens of unhappy customers of Able Energy Co., state officials are moving forward on two fronts to help Minnesotans recover thousands of dollars in down-payment money as well as provide protection for others who may be victimized by solar contractors in the future.
State regulators moved to revoke Able Energy's license in March after discovering that the company collected more than $1 million in advance payments but failed to finish about 200 jobs in Minnesota and Wisconsin.
State Sen. Tony Lourey, DFL-Kerrick, said Thursday he believes there will be bipartisan support for two bills he is proposing that would help protect consumers from unscrupulous solar contractors. Lourey said he will try to get those bills passed when the next session begins in January.
"I think the case for fixing this is very strong," said Lourey, who attended a meeting convened by angry Able Energy customers last week. "This is a pretty egregious situation."
In a lawsuit filed last week, the state Department of Labor and Industry accused Able Energy and its owner, Michael J. Harvey, of defrauding customers by making "numerous misrepresentations" about its capacity and willingness to install solar panels on homes throughout the state.
The department is seeking restitution on behalf of the company's customers, as well as an order barring Harvey from doing solar work for any other companies.
Though Able Energy hasn't held a valid electrical contractor's license in Minnesota since February, Able and its agents tricked a Rochester doctor into handing over $11,070 in April by promising his solar project would be completed by September, according to the lawsuit. The company has not responded to "any of his numerous phone calls" since collecting the money.
State officials said the doctor's experience fits a pattern in which Able Energy representatives would make promises that the company couldn't fulfill in order to obtain the largest down payments possible from its customers. In some cases, customers were promised a quicker start date if they made a larger down payment, while others were strung along for months with false promises that work was going to begin soon.