It has been 25 years since a group of Minnesota's largest businesses came together in hopes of using their combined buying power to influence the health care market.
Among the marquee names were Dayton Hudson, Honeywell, Carlson Companies, Pillsbury, 3M and General Mills. They joined forces with the aim of getting the best value possible for the health services they were buying for their employees.
With the federal health law and other market reforms underway, the business coalition recently changed its name and expanded its member focus. Now known as the Minnesota Health Action Group, it includes small, medium and large businesses as well as hospital systems, county and state government employers, and the University of Minnesota.
Over the years, the group has helped set statewide standards for measuring health outcomes. Its "Bridges to Excellence" program recently awarded nearly $650,000 to clinics around the state for improving the health and reducing costs of treating people with diabetes, vascular disease and depression. The rewards are paid by employers, based on how many of their workers are treated at the clinics.
Carolyn Pare, CEO of the organization since 2000, spoke recently about the importance and challenges of refocusing her organization in an age of health reform.
Q: What was behind the decision to change your name in July 2012?
A: We first started out in the late 1980s and early '90s as the Business Health Care Action Group. When the State Employee Group joined us in 1994, we changed to the Buyers Health Care Action Group. With a lot happening relative to national reform, it became important to identify where we were most needed. Health care is local. We knew we could still meet the local needs of our legacy members, mostly jumbo employers based in the Twin Cities who do business around the world. But we weren't meeting the needs all of the employers and government entities doing business in Minnesota. We have since been doing outreach across the state to organizations that have a strong commitment to the health of their employees and the economic vitality of the state.
Q: How has the process gone?