"A vote for Trump is a vote against Minneapolis"? Seriously, it's come to this? ("The Twin Cities don't speak for the state," Opinion Exchange, Nov. 12.)
Let me get this straight. Ari Kaufman thinks that a Minnesotan in Farmington or Fergus Falls or Faribault should vote for a billionaire from New York simply to punish Minneapolis? For what? Because our city has a plan that will allow for more housing density? Because violence broke out outside the Target Center after the Trump rally? Because our mayor demanded that President Donald Trump's campaign prepay for policing and other services at his rally rather than stick taxpayers with the bill? Because we all live in a bubble and couldn't care less about the rest of the state?
Come on.
I love this state. I love that we teach our kids to be honest, to treat others with respect and to stand up to bullies. I love that we stand with our neighbors, all our neighbors, from Mankato to McGregor to Moose Lake to Minneapolis and all towns in between.
We already have a wall going up in Texas; we don't need to build another one here.
Timothy Hennum, Minneapolis
• • •
A vote for Trump may be a vote against Minneapolis. A vote for Trump is also a vote for allowing a racist to live in the White House.
Mark J. Weber, Minneapolis
• • •
I hope Kaufman works for the Heritage Foundation, because I haven't seen a better assemblage of scary support for the thesis that the metro area is a hotbed for liberal dysfunction and intolerance that will eventually push greater Minnesota to build a majority for a more balanced candidate who can turn Minnesota red. Wait a minute — does Kaufman mean Trump?
To hear the writer tell it, the metro is a cauldron of "growing crime" and "mob-style attacks," opposition to "sensible projects that help greater Minnesota," "Omar's offensive rants" and the sordid history of Black Lives Matter. So many scary things and colors.