Minnesota U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar faced off against fellow Democratic presidential candidates Tuesday night in the final nationally televised debate ahead of the Iowa Caucuses.
The Minnesota Democrat, still trailing the top four rivals in the polls, focused much of her energy on President Donald Trump, the Star Tribune's Stephen Montemator reports.
Strong performances in recent debates resulted in a boost in fundraising and positive coverage. So how did Tuesday's showing compare? Here's a look at what leading publications and pundits are saying.
CNN's Chris Cillizza declared Klobuchar a winner, but noted she "was less of a standout in this debate than in the last" debate.
"Would Klobuchar have hoped for a little more of a star turn in this debate? Yes. Will she be broadly happy with her performance? Also, yes."
New York Times opinion writers offered mixed reviews, with an average score of 6.6 out of 10.
"The new centrist hope. Her reasonableness, competency and empathy could carry her to an upset in Iowa, and maybe in New Hampshire, too." - Hector Tobar
"A weak debate. She often stumbled and sounded uncomfortable. She must be all in on Nevada with all the casino and gambling references." - Liz Mair