Is there such a thing as too much youth hockey in Minnesota? Or is an Edina business that has groomed kids who became hockey stars being wrongfully squeezed out of a chance to develop them?
Those questions factor prominently in a federal court faceoff between Minnesota youth hockey powers over a new rule that limits winter league play for thousands of young players in southern and western Twin Cities suburbs.
The legal battle pits the statewide governing body of amateur hockey against an Edina business that runs youth hockey leagues, tournaments and clinics and whose former students include several National Hockey League players.
That business, Minnesota Made Hockey Inc. (MMHI), has sued the state amateur hockey association, a nonprofit called Minnesota Hockey Inc., and its District 6 member group.
The business argues that a new District 6 restriction on league play violates federal anti-trust laws by unlawfully restraining free competition. MMHI owner Bernie McBain alleges in court papers that 40 to 50 percent of his customers come from District 6 and that he has already lost clients because of the new rule.
"Kids are afraid to sign up for the program because they're afraid they'll be kicked off the [District 6] teams where their friends are," said Michael Glover, MMHI's attorney. Glover said his client was concerned that the rule could spread statewide.
Dave Margenau, president of Minnesota Hockey, confirmed that the amateur hockey association is considering a similar rule that would cover the whole state. "The Minnesota State High School League has a similar rule," he said.
Robert DeMay, attorney for District 6 and the amateur hockey group, said in an e-mail that the rule was passed this summer because participating "in two demanding leagues detracts from that experience both for the player and his/her teammates. This rule minimizes the likelihood that games will have to be rescheduled or played short-handed and promotes team-building."