Minnesota lawmakers began their third legislative session in the shadow of COVID-19 on Monday, with pledges from both sides of the aisle to address statewide anxieties around rising crime, a strained education system and the health and economic fallout of the pandemic.
"Today we start by recognizing how hard and unsettling these past two years have been for all of us," Senate Minority Leader Melisa López Franzen said during a morning news conference alongside her Senate DFL colleagues. "Every Minnesota family, community and business has been hit hard by the deadly pandemic that has upended our economy and strained our public health, our long-term care and our child-care systems to the brink. And Minnesotans are feeling it."
DFL Gov. Tim Walz and both parties in the divided Legislature have outlined lengthy — and at times dueling — lists of priorities in recent weeks, many signaling how leaders want to spend a projected $7.7 billion surplus. On the table are proposals for tax cuts, infrastructure borrowing, front-line worker bonuses, improving education outcomes, expanding access to affordable housing, reducing child-care and health care costs and tackling violent crime.
Republican Senate Majority Leader Jeremy Miller said the historic budget surplus gives both parties an opportunity to address rising crime and focus on kids in the classroom after nearly two years of on-and-off closures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Republicans also want to give back much of the surplus in permanent income tax cuts targeting lower and middle tax brackets and the elimination of taxes on Social Security income.
"When you have a surplus that large it means one thing: The state is collecting too much money from the taxpayers, so we are going to focus on permanent, ongoing tax relief so Minnesotans see more money in their pocket every single paycheck," Miller said.
Miller criticized Walz's proposal to use $700 million of the surplus on one-time tax rebates — which the governor called "Walz checks" — as "barely scratching the surface."
"We might be OK with a one-time payment, but you know what, it's got to be a heckuva lot larger than what the governor is proposing, and we're not going to call them a 'Walz check,'" he said. "It is not Gov. Walz's money, it's the people's money."
Republican House Minority Leader Kurt Daudt said that because legislators approved a budget during the last session, "it's tough to make the case now that we need to spend more on state government."