The receiver rounding up assets in what federal prosecutors describe as the worst investment fraud scheme in the history of Minnesota filed a heavily redacted lawsuit Tuesday in Minneapolis accusing Associated Bank of helping convicted fraudster Trevor Cook carry out a $194 million Ponzi scheme.
Receiver R.J. Zayed said in the complaint that Cook and his associates needed "a cooperative bank" that would allow sham deposits to be posted in the names of fictitious business entities and create bogus account documentation with false information to get around federal money-laundering and anti-terrorism funding laws. He alleges they found that in Associated Bank of Green Bay, Wis., which took in more than $79 million in investor funds.
The bank's lawyers did not respond to a message seeking comment Tuesday night. When the bank was sued in 2009 by a group of Cook's investors alleging negligence, a bank spokeswoman declined to comment on the specific allegations of a pending lawsuit.
In that case, a group of investors sued the bank, alleging the bank was negligent in the handling of funds they had given Cook. But the bank prevailed when a Wisconsin judge found the bank had no duty to non-customers to investigate allegedly fraudulent activity taking place in the bank's accounts.
Zayed is suing on behalf of the entities Cook used to defraud the investors, and he's alleging complicity rather than negligence.
His lawsuit says Cook, his convicted associate Patrick Kiley, and Shadi Swais, a Jordanian who ran a Swiss currency trading firm called Crown Forex SA, were counseled by former Associated Bank vice president Lien Sarles, 30, of St. Paul, on how to conduct money transfers to avoid "regulatory difficulties."
The suit says the bank official counseled Cook and his associates not to open an account in the name of Crown Forex SA, but to create a domestic limited liability company called Crown Forex LLC to receive investor funds that would be transferred offshore.
Cook created the entity but never registered it and used it to run a sham account, the suit says. "Associated Bank knew this and still opened the account," it says.