At first blush, it was a line I wish I had written. "When wine drinkers tell me they taste notes of cherries, tobacco and rose petals, usually all I can detect is a whole lot of jackass," began a recent column by the Los Angeles Times' Joel Stein.
But while I completely get where Stein is coming from --who hasn't been amused or flabbergasted by a flowery delineation of sundry smells? -- discussing aromas can be an interesting, edifying and, most important, fun activity for wine drinkers at all levels of expertise. It's all about the tone of the conversation.
Besides, holding up wine snobs for ridicule has a distinct whiff of straw dog.
I often ask wine experts about the best ways to develop tasting skills. The answer I get most often is along these lines: Taste with experts and listen to their observations. If they get tobacco or black cherries or rose petals, see if you can pick up on that. If you don't, no biggie. But if you do, it's a useful experience in and of itself, and should help you recognize that aroma the next time you encounter it.
And don't just listen; speak up. I was at dinner recently with some experts and got a weird whiff from a Napa cabernet. I had enjoyed just enough wine to feel emboldened to blurt out: "I'm getting that baseball-card-bubble-gum smell."
In short order, two men agreed, and it wasn't the power of suggestion. (The women at the table never had cracked open a pack of cards and experienced that unique amalgam of chalky gum and dry cardboard.) Since then, I've picked up that aroma a couple of times from Napa cabs.
The lesson: If you smell it, tell it. There are no "wrong" aromas.
Conversely, there are often very few "right" aromas to be gleaned from publications. The person writing those descriptors was tasting the wine at a different stage of its development. Wines evolve, and there also can be differences between bottles. The esteemed wine importer and writer Kermit Lynch explains: