Will common sense prevail in CBA talks?

One would like to think so, but we're a little more than two months from the expiration date and no one seems to be thinking about how the fans will react to a lockout.

December 28, 2010 at 10:41PM

Four Downs while hoping, but doubting, that millionaire players and billionaire owners will use common sense at any point as they barrel toward the March 4 expiration of the current collective bargaining agreement ...

FIRST DOWN:

From the "Duh" department, we bring you players' union executive committee member Brian Dawkins saying there's a sense of urgency to avoid a lockout because it would really tick off the average schlub that supports the NFL like a bad habit.

"I would think common sense would say at the end of the day, after all the fighting and after all the words are said, we understand who butters our bread," the veteran Broncos safety said Tuesday. "That's where the urgency comes in at."

As we all know, one of the major hurdles is the so-called "enhanced" 18-game regular-season schedule.

The players don't like it at all.

"I don't think with good conscience we could say, 'Guys, this is all we could get for you for 18 games. Go out there and strap it up and hope you make it through,'" said Mike Vrabel, another NFLPA executive committee member and a veteran linebacker for the Chiefs.

Dawkins and Vrable went on to talk about how the 18-game season would shorten careers.

Personally, my beef with the longer season doesn't concern shorter careers. Or the long-term health of the players. While I wish all of them long and healthy lives, they're grown men making the decision to play a violent game that could have long-lasting ramifications.

My beef with the longer season is the fact it will hurt the quality of play late in the season and into the playoffs. And hurting the quality of play at that point is a zillion times worse than having four boring preseason games.

SECOND DOWN:

Geez, I hope there's no snow expected in Philly tonight. I'd hate to see this game postponed until June. And on a serious note, let's hope this doesn't become a standard practice every time there's a blizzard in the forecast.

For what it's worth, I'm looking at about a 38-3 Iggles victory. Hopefully, the Vikings can keep it that close.

The loser in this series of weather-related delays and stadium hopping is poor Leslie Frazier. I still think he'll get the Vikings job because, frankly, it's no longer an attractive post, and he'll be as qualified or more than anyone else the Wilfs can get. But no interim coach in the history of football has been dealt a series of obstacles like the ones Frazier has faced the past three weeks.

THIRD DOWN:

It's hard to fathom Drew Brees having thrown 21 interceptions. But he's having to carry the Saints a little more than he did last season. I think New Orleans could run the ball more than they do, but Sean Payton loves to put the game in Brees' hands. And who can blame him.

Brees looked like Bad Brett on at least one pass last night -- the shovel pass he flipped blindly into the DE's arms for a pick-six -- but in the end, Brees showed that the Saints very well could be right back in the Super Bowl this season. That 14-play, 90-yard game-winning drive at Atlanta, where the Falcons were 19-1 during Matt Ryan's career, showed that Brees will be able to win anywhere he ends up in the post-season.

Speaking of the Falcons, did anyone else think Mike Smith was completely nuts for punting the ball with 2:52 left, trailing by three and facing a fourth-and-six near midfield?

Did anyone honestly expect Brees to give the ball back to Atlanta? Not me. And the game ended with the Saints up 17-13 and Atlanta still on defense.

However, that being said, the game ultimately was meaningless if the Falcons simply beat Carolina (2-13) at home on Sunday. That's give them all they need: the NFC South and homefield advantage throughout the playoffs.

FOURTH DOWN:

When is the NFL going to wake up and re-seed its playoff teams based on records and not division championships?

The answer could be next week if Seattle wins the NFC West with a 7-9 record. That would be the first losing team to participate in the playoffs. And it would get a home game, probably against the Saints. That's not right.

Seattle (6-9) plays at St. Louis (7-8) in a winner-take-all game Sunday night. Neither team deserves to be seeded higher than either one of the wild-card teams. Especially Seattle, which has lost games by scores of 41-7, 34-19, 31-14, 20-3, 33-3, 42-24, 40-21, 34-18 and 38-15.

It looks like Charlie Whitehurst will be at quarterback for Seattle. Personally, I'd like to see the Seahawks get in at 7-9. That would put pressure on the NFL to rethink it's seeding process.

about the writer

about the writer

Mark Craig

Sports reporter

Mark Craig has covered the NFL nearly every year since Brett Favre was a rookie back in 1991. A sports writer since 1987, he is covering his 30th NFL season out of 37 years with the Canton (Ohio) Repository (1987-99) and the Star Tribune (1999-present).

See Moreicon