There is a clamoring to expand video replay in the NHL, although general managers didn't reach a consensus of the best way to go about it during last week's meetings in Boca Raton, Fla.
Wild GM Chuck Fletcher said the one specific play many managers would like to see considered for expanded video review is when goalie interference may cause a goal.
"But how is that best handled?" Fletcher said. "Is that a coach's challenge or initiated from hockey ops in Toronto or from referees initiating the review? That's what we're still discussing."
One idea is to put a video monitor in the penalty box like in college hockey. If a goal is scored and a referee believes there may have been goalie interference, he can look himself.
On Feb. 28 in Vancouver, Wild defenseman Keith Ballard had a goal waved off by referee Brad Meier when Meier felt Wild forward Erik Haula made incidental contact with Canucks goalie Eddie Lack. Replays showed Haula didn't touch Lack and was out of the crease before Ballard even attempted the shot.
But the play wasn't reviewable.
"I don't know how it would hurt the game if that was reviewable," Haula said. "In football, they review every touchdown. That should be in hockey. If the puck goes into the net, every goal should be reviewed. I think there should be a rule where the referee can't signal 'no goal' until he knows for sure and it's looked at."
Often times though, if there's not definitive video evidence of a good goal or bad goal, the ref's decision counts. That was the case Nov. 25 when Zach Parise had a goal waved off for a high stick.