There's a lot of misunderstanding among the traveling public and beyond about bus-rapid transit, or BRT, according to a recent post on Mobility Lab, the website for a Virginia-based transportation research and development group.
The fact that BRT is highly reliable (read: on time) is often lost in the chatter, because the media, transit agencies and planners usually focus on the service's flashier elements, such as fancy buses with Wi-Fi, the group said.
The post goes on to state that research shows that reliability is the most important attribute among people using mass transit. In short, BRT is the Toyota Camry of transit, because it's reliable and sensible.
A definition of BRT might be in order, although this can be tricky.
The Institute for Transportation and Development Policy defines BRT as having dedicated bus-only lanes, which promote faster travel and ensure that buses aren't delayed because of traffic congestion.
Other BRT basics include: busway alignment in the center of the road or a separate bus-only corridor; keeping buses away from curbs; fare payment at the station, instead of on the bus; a ban on turns across the bus lane for traffic, and platform-level boarding, making it accessible for wheelchairs, strollers and carts.
Bus-rapid transit has proved popular in places such as South America and China, although there are a few "true" BRT lines in the United States, including the HealthLine in Cleveland and the Orange Line in Los Angeles.
Part of the problem is that BRT in the United States involves different kinds of bus service that may not fit a prescribed description. That's certainly true in the Twin Cities, where there's no BRT system that has its own busway — yet.