Joe and me are back at it, picking WCHA again. Joe does research. I go with gut feelings.That's why my comments are much shorter.
Last week I went 7-1 picking WCHA games, my best weekend of the season. I need to stay hot because Joe Van Thomme, a lawyer in real life who lives in St. Paul, is pretty sharp. He has beaten me several times already this season. But it's what you have done lately that counts, right?
And this week I will get my revenge.
Without further adieu, here are this weekend's pick coming at you at high noon:
St. Cloud State @ Colorado College
Joe says: The first-place Huskies, a surprise to just about everyone in the league (with the exception of your know-it-all buddy who swears he picked SCSU to win the MacNaughton), head to CC for a weekend series that might have a little more intrigue than Scott Owens and his alternative film industry hair cut.
To put it simply, St. Cloud has played well when it counts. In nonconference games, they've played to an underwhelming mark of 3-5, while giving up 3.13 goals/game and dropping games they arguably should win (home loss to Rensselaer, swept at home by Northern Michigan). But in WCHA play, they are a different team. Led by Ryan Faragher, whose inconsistency issues correlate with the team's nonconference woes, St. Cloud gives up just 2.14 goals/game to WCHA opponents, and have avoided the "bad" weekend by getting at least two points in every conference series. The Huskies have a fairly comfortable lead in the league race and a favorable schedule down the stretch.
...which brings us to Colorado College. CC started the year scoring goals (and lots of them - 3.61 goals/game through their first 18) and picking up a win here and there against teams like Air Force, Wisconsin, and North Dakota. Up to that point, the Tigers also confirmed what we knew about them defensively -- they would give up a lot of goals. Through their home series with Minnesota in December, CC was giving away 3.5 goals/game, which explained their 8-8-2 record at the time. Since then however, the Tigers have spiraled to a 3-6-3 streak (with four straight overtime games). The difference from first-half to second-half? CC in the first-half was like Super Tecmo Bowl vs. your college roommate -- lots of points for each side, you might win as many as you lost, everyone's happy. The second-half Tigers are like playing Super Tecmo Bowl against your friend's older brother, who picks the 49ers and knows the cheat codes -- you can only muster a few Thurman Thomas TDs, he wins and someone ends up crying. Despite consistent scoring from F Rylan Schwartz (35 points), F Will Rapuzzi (33 points) and D Mike Boivin (tied for 5th in WCHA goals with 12), this team has played itself out of games with porous defense (56th in all of college hockey at 3.5 goals given up per game). Joe Howe and Josh Thorimbert have had the unenviable task of trying to stop the leaks, but ultimately haven't been very good themselves. Home-ice may be a longshot for the Tigers at this point, but points against the first-place team would certainly help. Can CC punch a few in early and hang on? Or will SCSU be too much?