An analysis of PFC levels in residents of Cottage Grove, Lake Elmo and Oakdale confirms the cause-effect link between how much unfiltered water those people drank and the amount of the pervasive chemical compounds were found in their system.
"It really is the water," said Ginny Yingling, a hydrogeologist in the Environmental Health Division of the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) who is part of the agency's team that has been investigating PFCs — perfluorochemicals. Results of the analysis were discussed at a recent public meeting in Oakdale.
"This confirms that drinking water was a major source of exposure," said Jean Johnson, director of the agency's biomonitoring program. "It also conforms that efforts to reduce PFC levels are working."
Thanks to dozens of volunteers in the three communities, MDH officials knew through biomonitoring (sampling of blood and tissues) that PFC levels among residents had fallen significantly from 2008 to 2010.
The numbers had been well above the U.S. average. But they had declined following a mammoth cleanup of groundwater by 3M Co. at sites where PFCs had been legally dumped over decades. The company stopped making the chemical compounds, used in an array of products, in 2002, but they continue to be used by other manufacturers. PFCs are so widely used — in microwave popcorn bags and other food packaging, water-resistant materials, carpet stain preventives, to name a few — that the three most common types are found in more than 98 percent of the U.S. population.
What the local numbers didn't show was the more detailed connection between the data and the nearly 200 study participants. To drill deeper, the MDH investigators got more personal in their quest for answers. The follow-up used detailed survey questions to clarify if efforts to remove the PFCs from water co-related with reduced exposure, Johnson said, and whether other habits like diet and use of particular consumer goods had an effect.
Biomonitoring measured levels of seven different types of PFCs, she said. The three most common — with alphabet-soup chemical names of PFOA, PFOS and PFHxS — were found in all participants.
The analysis found three main findings: