In Saturday morning's StarTribune, on the editorial page, is an opinion piece by a Waconia city councilman, Jim Sanborn. It is about -- you guessed it -- Double-crested Cormorants. Mr. Sanborn is long on opinion, long on exaggeration, long on supposition, and short on fact.
Let's follow along as he writes.
"The economic, environmental, and wildlife impact of these birds is staggering," says Mr. Sanborn.
The fact is: There have been many, many research projects done in several states by state wildlife agencies, several university research teams, and by government agencies in two countries. Very little conclusive evidence has been found showing that cormorants have a harmful impact on game fish, the economy, the environment, or other wildlife. Studies in Minnesota show no problem meriting solution.
Mr. Sanborn uses "simple math" to tell us that the cormorants remove 100,000 pounds of fish from the lake in a typical summer. That's too many pounds, he says.
How many pounds of fish are in the lake to begin with? How many pounds are removed by fishermen, disease, turtles, herons, egrets, gulls, etc.? What is the recruitment rate of the lake (rate of replacement)? The fish breed. Each year fish are naturally added to the population. (Plus, the DNR stocks walleyes). So, how does the removal rate stack up with the recruitment rate? Is there a net gain or loss or is fish population stable? Mr. Sanborn does not tell us.
He also fails to mention the DNR fisheries survey in summer 2010 of the game fish population in the lake. This was 2010, remember, several years after cormorant complaints began. The DNR in effect gave Lake Waconia a grade of A: No shortage of game fish of any species. Great place to fish.
Fish taken from the lake by cormorants are "destroyed," Mr. Sanborn says. How do you describe removal of fish by fishermen? Are they destroying fish?