When Steve Hamrick left his last job as manager at a software corporation, he had at least 25 unheard messages in his office voice mailbox. And that's not counting the unreturned calls on his cell phone or land line at home.
It's not that he doesn't like to talk. But with the cascade of messages he receives by e-mail, texting and on Facebook, Hamrick, 29, a self-described "voice-mail phobic" from Cupertino, Calif., said he'd found better ways to keep in touch.
"I had to give up something and that, for me, was voice mail," he said. "It's cutting out some forms of communication to make room for the others."
When it was introduced in the early 1980s, voice mail was hailed as a miracle invention -- a boon to office productivity and a godsend to busy households. But in an age of instant information gratification, the burden of having to hit the playback button -- or worse, dial in to a mailbox and enter a pass code -- and sit through "ums" and "ahs" can seem too much to bear.
Many dread the process or, like Hamrick, avoid it altogether, raising the question: Is voice mail on its way to becoming obsolete?
"Once upon a time, voice mail was useful," said Yen Cheong, 32, a book publicist in New York who has moved almost entirely to e-mail and text messaging. According to her calculation, it takes seven to 10 steps to check a voice-mail message vs. zero to three for an e-mail.
"If you left a message, I have to dial in, dial in my code," Cheong said. "Then I mess up and redial. Then once I hear the message, I need the phone number. I try to write it down, and then I have to rewind the message to hear it again," she added, feigning exhaustion.
Tim Kassouf from Baltimore, 24, who calls himself "a certified voice-mail hater," said he had 68 messages, 62 of them unheard, in his cell phone mailbox. Scott Taylor, 41, a senior manager at an e-commerce company in Phoenix, said voice mail was "just totally an ineffective communication method, almost ancient now."