The upcoming report on the feasibility of a new stadium in Arden Hills for the Minnesota Vikings will neither give the project a green light nor pronounce it dead on arrival.
"I don't think it's likely we're going to say, 'Don't do this,'" said Metropolitan Council regional administrator Patrick Born, who is helping compile the review. "This is more for the governor and the Legislature to have more information."
But the much-anticipated findings, due to be released this week, are already being eyed skeptically by Vikings officials, who say they asked pointedly whether the conclusions might effectively scuttle the $1.1 billion project. Met Council official Arlene McCarthy, in outlining the thorny soil cleanup issues at the former Army ammunition plant, said at a briefing that "it's just complicated."
The report, according to the Met Council and the Vikings, will address road upgrades, pollution remediation, site acquisition from the federal government and potential delays over construction and permitting requirements.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Chairman Ted Mondale said the report will end several ongoing controversies, including an earlier insistence by the Vikings that the state pass stadium legislation "without knowing the costs." The team also wanted the option to "walk away at any time," he said. "That wasn't happening." Asked whether the report could send the project to the scrap heap, Mondale said, "I have no idea. I'm not going to presuppose what the findings are."
Met Council officials, including chairwoman Susan Haigh, caution that the report's scope will be limited. "Our job is to provide neutral, objective, unbiased analysis," Haigh said in a public briefing. "It's really not an opinion about the site."
The Arden Hills site, heavily favored by the Vikings, is the state's biggest Superfund site and requires extensive decontamination. The report is expected to give the first detailed look at the extent of that cleanup and its costs.
Waiting in the wings are three other sites in Minneapolis, each with its own challenges and none supported by the Vikings. A favorable report could generate momentum for a special legislative session this year that would approve a public subsidy package for the Vikings, while an unfavorable one could pave the way for an alternative site to get a fresh look.