Opinion editor’s note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
By most standard economic measures, President Joe Biden has presided over a strong economy. In terms of growth, job creation, wage gains and employment levels, it’s hard to find fault. But, as everyone knows, voters heading to the polls in November aren’t feeling the way the data suggests they should.
Why? Inflation and its corollary, the high cost of borrowing money.
Everyday Americans are still suffering from the price spike that hit during the early days of Biden’s administration, and no amount of evidence showing that inflation is back down again has changed that fundamental view.
While the Federal Reserve deserves credit for guiding the post-pandemic recovery without putting the country into a recession, America is still feeling what some have dubbed a silent recession, or “vibecession.” A Gallup poll in January found that 45% of Americans rate the economy as “poor,” and most of the respondents said it’s getting worse.
That’s not the message from the White House, certainly, or from the Fed. But some economists looking for an explanation have focused on whether inflation is being undercounted, an idea once dismissed as a flimsy right-wing talking point.
A new economic analysis by former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers and several others suggests inflation was much worse at its peak than the official numbers showed. The reason is that the method for calculating inflation changed: In 1983, the government took housing finance expenses out of the formula for the consumer price index. Among other changes since then, it replaced homeownership costs with a less-volatile metric based on rent.