The Minnesota Legislature edged Saturday toward a dramatic showdown over the most sweeping union expansion in recent history as legislators braced for an overnight marathon debate on the proposal.
The highly anticipated watershed over whether child-care workers can unionize came after an already grueling day that saw legislators take up several large budget measures and race to finish last-minute changes to a $2 billion tax bill that includes aid for hallmark projects, including the Mayo Clinic and Mall of America. Legislators must adjourn the session by midnight on Monday.
Fiery crowds on both sides of the union debate built in the Capitol throughout the day, some of them having already fought over the issue for close to a decade.
"We'll have a legal voice to collectively bargain with the state," said Sharon O'Boyle, a child-care provider in Washington County. "That's what we need — we need that legal voice."
Jennifer Parrish operates a family child-care business in Rochester and has been fighting child-care unionization for eight years. "I'm tired, and quite frankly, I'm broke," she said. "The way the bill is written, the deck is definitely stacked in the union's favor."
The labor debate is the last stand for opponents of a proposal to allow child-care and home health workers to unionize. If successful, the state's two largest unions could add more than 20,000 new dues-paying members. Those unions could then represent the workers in negotiations with the state. Unions would have until 2017 to convince home health workers or child-care workers to organize. Neither group would have the right to strike, according to the proposal.
Many political watchers consider it the most consequential vote of the session, potentially more destructive to the DFL majorities than last week's vote to legalize same-sex marriage.
"I believe this is more of a private business issue and an attack on entrepreneurship," said Rep. Tim Kelley, R-Red Wing. About 70 percent of messages from his district have been against the measure, he said. "I guess overreaching would be not a strong enough word."