The Twins' penchant for gut-punching losses this season has sent fans scurrying in two opposite directions:
1) A vocal (and larger) group angry or frustrated about pretty much everything, with the bullpen and Rocco Baldelli's decisions at the top of the list. That group is convinced this will be a lost season;
2) A measured (smaller) group urging patience, noting that seemingly all that could go wrong has gone wrong and imagining a final 134 games in which the Twins get back on track and contend as expected at the start of the year.
Both groups were represented on Wednesday's Daily Delivery podcast, as I ran through some listener opinions after a disheartening bullpen meltdown Tuesday dropped the Twins to 11-17.
Where I tend to land is here: The Twins are better than their record indicates. But spotting their competition 28 games with just 11 wins puts them in a bind even if they improve as the year goes on.
It's just a matter of math. Let's take a brief look at eight years of history, from 2012-2019:
*In those years, to win the AL Central by a reasonable margin — three games was my definition — a team would have have had to win, on average, 89 games. Sometimes the winning team won way more than that (like 2019 when the Twins won 101 games), But 89 wins would have been enough on average and it could even be enough this year.
*In those years, the average second AL Wild Card team won 91 games. So if some team goes and wins 100 games this year and puts the division out of reach, that's the standard for at least getting into the postseason for an AL team.