Major League Baseball owners and the MLB Players Association have taken turns proposing ways to start the 2020 season — only for those proposals to be launched into oblivion by the other side like a hanging breaking ball.
Owners claim they will lose hundreds of thousands of dollars each game — one report had it over $600,000 — by playing in stadiums this season without fans, something the union finds hard to believe. The apparent mistrust between the sides has fueled speculation about the possible cancellation of the 2020 season.
Not so fast.
MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred might implement a 50-game schedule — less than one-third of the standard 162-game schedule — in which the players would receive their salaries pro rata. It's not the 114-game schedule the players association proposed Sunday, but it's the pay scale they seek.
Perhaps it is the worst-case scenario. Perhaps the sides can negotiate for a few more games. But it's something to work with, and it is a possible path to playing baseball.
"I can tell you that as of [Tuesday], I am more optimistic about playing this season as I have been over the last couple of weeks," Twins President Dave St. Peter said. "I know there's a lot of media reporting and speculation [otherwise], but I think the reality of it is that the situation is a little closer to resolution than most people believe. I truly believe that.
"I think it is rooted in the reality that owners and players ultimately want to play. I think they want to find a bridge, come together. I know that's the case with the owners and I know that's the case of our players. I can't speak for the other 29 clubs."
The sides have been battling since late March, when they agreed to an altered salary structure as the coronavirus outbreak upended sports leagues worldwide. But the players and owners ended up disagreeing about the agreement. Owners claimed they could renegotiate a deal for a season with no fans allowed in stadiums; the union felt the March agreement was ironclad.