Prosecutors have the gun that Brian G. Fitch Sr. allegedly used to kill a Mendota Heights police officer last summer.
They have witnesses who saw Fitch's green Pontiac Grand Am speed away from the fallen officer.
They have Fitch's own words, including what he allegedly told his girlfriend: "If he was stopped, he would go so far as shooting a police officer." And to an officer: "Just so you know, I hate cops and I'm guilty."
Meanwhile Fitch's defense team has been mostly silent about their strategy. Technically they don't even need a strategy because, above all else, they have the bedrock of the American judicial system: the presumption of innocence.
When potential jurors file into the Stearns County Courthouse Monday morning, it will be nearly six months since police officer Scott Patrick, 47, tried to make a routine traffic stop. Instead, someone in the car he pulled over shot him three times and left him to die on the street.
"Every homicide is tragic, every homicide is emotional," said former Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner, who prosecuted the man accused of killing St. Paul police Sgt. Jerry Vick in 2005. "But there is an extra layer when it is a police officer who has given up his or her life as part of the job of protecting us."
The trial, expected to start Jan. 20 if a jury is seated by then, comes amid a national conversation about police and police tactics that was sparked by recent events in Missouri and New York. In August, Michael Brown, an unarmed black man, was shot and killed by a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo. Since then in New York City, Eric Garner, an asthmatic man, died while in a police chokehold, and two police officers were killed, execution style, by a man who made statements on social media that he was upset by the Garner and Brown cases and planned to kill police officers.
Bradford Colbert, an adjunct professor in residence at William Mitchell College of Law in St. Paul, said prosecutors and defense attorneys will have to be mindful of those cases during jury selection.