With time remaining to plant trees in Minnesota this fall, John Ball has a suggestion for gardeners: Look at what your neighbors are planting — and choose something different.
The South Dakota State University forestry professor says it's time to give up easy but unwise tree choices and make a real effort at diversifying the urban forest, lest we face a new tree catastrophe like Dutch elm disease.
"In 30 years, some exotic threat will come over and wipe out the maples, and everyone will say, 'Why didn't we plant something else?' " he said.
Ball, who once managed a tree-care company in Duluth, recently spoke to Minnesota tree care specialists in the Twin Cities. His argument is that if people really care about trees, in an age when global trade makes it easy for pests to cross oceans and continents, they should plant no more than 5 percent of one type of tree in an area.
That means that just 5 percent of the trees Minnesotans love most in their yards — maples — would be planted. Only 5 percent would be oak or birch. Trees that are now underplanted, like Kentucky coffee tree, buckeyes and shagbark hickory, would become more common.
Ball admits the 5 percent limit is aggressive, perhaps even unrealistic. But he said even trying to reach it would be a worthwhile goal.
"Rules are made to be broken," he said. "It doesn't mean that we won't get exotic threats, but it means the threat is limited."
Exotic vs. native
While some people advocate planting only native trees, Ball said that will not protect trees from pests. "I have no problems diversifying our urban forests with exotic trees if we avoid these problems," he said.