Q: My husband and I were booked on the Queen Mary 2 sailing from Southampton, England, to New York this year. The cruise line canceled the sailing just before our departure.
A Cunard agent told us to stay on board that night and depart the following day. The cruise line gave us a form to fill out that stated: "For any incurred expenses with your onward travel arrangements, these will be covered by Cunard."
The agents we spoke with three different times couldn't give us any information beyond that statement. So, we canceled our New York hotel and first-class flight from New York to San Diego, and we booked a flight home on British Airways.
I emailed Cunard with the necessary documentation. I received an email saying the refund process would take some time and asking that I be patient. A few weeks later, Cunard refunded $4,544, yet the cost of the cruise was $6,872. The difference of $2,328 is still owed.
A: I'm sorry about your canceled cruise. Most cruises are canceled long before guests arrive at the port, but it looks like yours was canceled at the last minute after you had flown to London. What a disappointment that must have been.
Cunard did the right thing by promising to reimburse your expenses, but it should have refunded you for everything instead of shorting you. The paper trail between you and Cunard offers no clue about the $2,328 shortfall.
I have a few theories. At the time of your cancellation, Cunard wanted to ensure that everyone got home safely and stress-free, so its offer to cover your expenses made sense. But then the accountants got involved, and they had to decide which expenses were legit and who was taking advantage of the situation.
I think it's important to be as specific as possible when making an offer to reimburse a traveler's expenses. Based on the information you sent, Cunard was perhaps short on the details.