As the St. Paul City Council prepares Wednesday to boost the Saints' ballpark budget by another $9 million a contingent of Lowertown denizens who wanted a year-round facility with parking remains unhappy they ended up having little say in the project's design.
That's because the process was gamed from the start, says City Council Member Dave Thune — who nevertheless will be sponsoring the resolutions to amend the ballpark's budget to $63 million and seek environmental grants to help cover the additional costs.
In e-mail exchanges obtained under the state Data Practices Act and in an interview last week, Thune said that St. Paul's Parks and Recreation Department — which is directing the project for the city — misled him into thinking that community feedback would be factored into decisions about the ballpark's look and use.
Thune said he had no idea that a ballpark design already was in place when he helped set up the community task force last year to give the residents some oversight on design and impacts.
"I felt kind of abused a little bit, and I made promises to people that as it turns out I couldn't keep," he said.
The Parks Department, he added, "didn't lie — it just wasn't talked about."
Thune's frustration with what he considers a faulty process helps explain why so many Lowertown residents say they were forced to accept a ballpark plan that they fear will detract from their neighborhood's quality of life.
"I just believe [city officials] made the decision not to involve the community," said John Mannillo, a longtime Lowertown developer who sits on the Lowertown Ballpark Design and Construction Committee, the district council's advisory task force. "I think they see it more as a hindrance than as a benefit. They wanted to get it done, and process can slow things down."