WASHINGTON – Three of Minnesota's freshly re-elected Democrats broke with their party Friday to approve a measure that directs construction of the long-delayed Keystone pipeline, which would lug crude oil from Canada to the Gulf Coast.
Reps. Rick Nolan, Collin Peterson and Tim Walz supported the construction, along with Republican Reps. Erik Paulsen, John Kline and Michele Bachmann. The measure heads to the Senate next week; if passed, however, it faces an uncertain future on President Obama's desk.
Though the pipeline would not run through Minnesota, it has become a flash point in the national debate on balancing job creation, energy independence and protecting the nation's natural resources. Nolan, who won re-election by one percentage point Nov. 4, was criticized on the campaign trail by his GOP opponent Stewart Mills for earlier votes against the pipeline.
The congressman, who will enter his second term, said he'd support the pipeline if it were constructed using domestic resources, including U.S. steel. That was a direct appeal to voters on the Iron Range, where up to 10,000 people earn their living, directly or indirectly, off the half-dozen taconite mines that dot the landscape. He also vowed to environmentalists in his district that he would look out for their interests, too.
But Friday's measure was a so-called clean vote, with no amendments and no debate. Republican House leaders didn't accept arguments made by Nolan to guarantee that the pipeline would be built with American steel.
Nolan said Friday he was annoyed there was no time allowed for amendments or debate. But he said he changed his position on the bill after he sensed his constituents wanted more compromise and bipartisanship from Congress. He also said this version was a better bill because it guaranteed the pipeline would still have to comply with environmental regulations.
"People are expecting some bipartisanship and compromise, and it's by no means a perfect bill," he said in an interview after the vote. "I'm convinced it's the best that can be accomplished."
Reviews from the Range
On the Range, where use of American steel had become a rallying cry of sorts, some questioned why politicians would support the pipeline if it's not going to benefit American workers immediately.