AUSTIN, Texas — Concepts some folks have trouble getting their brain around: Mack Brown as an ex-coach, Rick Perry as a presidential candidate, George W. Bush as a painter.
"Hey Van Gogh, how's the ear?" I was prepared to tell Bush if I got in wisecrack range during last week's Civil Rights Summit.
I didn't, perhaps saving myself a Secret Service throw-down. But a few days earlier I did get to see Bush's portraits of world leaders at his presidential library at Southern Methodist University in Dallas. I'm no art expert (and I'm not even sure I know what I like when I see it), but I was impressed with Bush's skills.
I can imagine some folks, especially folks who didn't think the Bush presidency was any good, won't think the portraits are any good. But I can't imagine anyone thinking they're not interesting.
We were puzzled when we first heard of Bush's new hobby. The feedback may run along political lines, but I'm impressed by his willingness to try something new and hold it up for public scrutiny.
"I fully understand the signature is worth more than the painting," Bush says on a video that plays at the exhibit.
People magazine asked Bill Arning, director of the Contemporary Arts Museum Houston, to critique Bush's portraits. He said they "definitely have something that makes them kind of memorable." Read that as you will.
Arning called them Chaim "Soutine-like portraits." Soutine, as you know if you read Wikipedia, "developed an individual style more concerned with shape, color and texture over representation." Darn if that isn't exactly what I thought of Bush's work, though I can't imagine him telling his instructor, "I see myself doing something in the Soutine oeuvre."