According to Donald Trump, he has been congratulated "for being right on radical Islamic terrorism" after 49 people died by a lone gunman's hand in an Orlando, Fla., nightclub. The shooting, however, proves him wrong on several major points that unite his supporters. Even though they will ignore the proof, it's worth laying out.
During the primary campaign, Trump kept using the November terror attacks in Paris to make the point that strict gun regulations increase the casualty count. France, he said over and over, had "the toughest gun laws in the world." Because of them, only the bad guys had guns. Had it been otherwise, fewer people would have died, Trump told applauding audiences.
At the Bataclan concert hall in Paris, 1,500 people were in the audience and, as Trump said, nobody had guns. Three gunmen killed 89 of the concertgoers.
But at the Pulse club in Orlando, about 320 people were present when Omar Mateen went on the rampage. A security guard — a cop working extra duty — opened fire, and two other officers who'd been nearby backed him up. Even so, the lone attacker managed to kill 49 people, a much bigger proportion of those present than in Paris.
Florida, with a permissive attitude to the National Firearms Act, is ranked 12th among the "best states for gun owners" by Guns & Ammo. Last year, the magazine gushed that:
"For many years, Florida's gun laws have been the envy of gun owners nationwide. The Sunshine State places no restrictions upon modern firearms, magazines or NFA items, and the state has a healthy competitive shooting network."
I have heard U.S. gun advocates claim that allowing more "good guys" to be armed serves as a deterrent to criminals, who are looking for victims, not a fight. The argument has always struck me as theoretical: It depends on the criminal and on how angry, skillful and indifferent to his survival he may be. Mateen has proved the theory wrong. As someone who carried a gun as part of his job, he was confident he'd do enough damage even if confronted.
If the Paris tragedy proved anything, it's that the relative looseness or toughness of gun laws is not the deciding factor. Criminals will still be able to get guns even if you limit magazine size or stop gun sales to people who, like Mateen, have been scrutinized by the Federal Bureau of Investigations for terrorist connections. Stricter French rules didn't stop the attackers there. Nevertheless, Florida's permissive gun culture probably helped Mateen more than it hindered him.