There isn't — and shouldn't be — a way to generate a public relations "win" from the resolution of a situation as layered and disturbing as the one involving Browns QB Deshaun Watson, who was accused of sexual misconduct by two dozen women.
But there is certainly a way to make it a bigger "loss," which is what happened Thursday when both the NFL and Watson himself fumbled the situation.
I discussed the situation on Friday's Daily Delivery podcast.
Let's start with the NFL, which reportedly was seeking at least a one-year ban for Watson.
One could give the league the benefit of the doubt and note that Thursday's settlement between the sides, which includes an 11-game unpaid suspension and a $5 million fine, represents a stiffer penalty than the six-game ban originally handed down by an arbitrator earlier this month. It also represents a relative midpoint between the original suspension and the length of a full season (17 games).
But if you want to look at it through a more skeptical lens, the numbers are a little too convenient. If the NFL was serious about pursuing a one-year ban, then why settle?
And more disturbingly, why settle on a length of punishment that makes it look like nothing short of a gross manufactured storyline. Including the Browns' bye week, Watson will be eligible to return in Week 13. Guess who is on Cleveland's schedule that week? A road game at Houston, Watson's old team.
If you think it's just a coincidence, you don't know the NFL. The league loves drama. If it's a matchup of recent Super Bowl foes or merely a player facing an old team without controversy attached, creating those matchups is fine. In this case, it feels cheap.