The Health Care Debate just got Personal

A system that offers secure and stable coverage, with primary concern for the well-being of the patient and, in the end, one that won't bankrupt the country. And at the top of the list, access for everyone to quality, affordable health care. Can we insure that?

August 17, 2009 at 3:48PM

The health care debate just got personal. The StarTribune announced its top 100 income study. The top corporate salary earner isthe head of St. Jude Medical, Inc. and the highest profits in Minnesota were from UnitedHealth Group, Inc. I don't know much about UnitedHealth Group, Inc.but I do know that I am alive today with a St. Jude heart valve. (Medtronicmakes great ones, too). And I know that when I had that open heart surgery,almost ten years ago, it cost well over $100,000 all told. Worth it? I'm alive. But others aren't. The Christian Century magazine current issue (Aug.25, 2009) reports that, "The Urban Institute estimates that 22,000 Americans dieeach year for lack of health care." It goes on to say "15 percent of the [U.S.]population is uninsured, and 24 percent say they have gone without care becauseof cost." In the next paragraph it reports that "The U.S. spends twice as muchof its GNP on health care as do European countries, while getting worseresults…."

I don't quibble that the health insurance system needs some work. Yet, Iam grateful for what I have had. I'malive and it didn't bankrupt me. Butothers aren't. Therein lies the dilemma. I want a system that offers secure andstable coverage, with primary concern for the well-being of the patient and, inthe end, one that won't bankrupt the country. And at the top of the list, accessfor everyone to quality, affordable health care. Can we insure that?

How about these as goals to be achieved in health insurance reform:

  1. Banning practices that preclude folks from getting into insurance plans because of pre-existing conditions or excluding in their plans pre-existing conditions
    1. Banning practices that have dropped patients because of conditions that develop while on the plan
      1. Banning gender discrimination
        1. Including prevention benefits in coverage
          1. Putting caps on the amount of patient out-of-pocket costs, lifetime and/or annual, rather than having caps on insurance coverage
            1. Having a public option plan, which can promote competition, and keep costs lower (it works for Medicare)
              1. Making sure that there is an affordable plan for everyone including the expansion of Medicaid up to 130% of the poverty level
                1. Increase in costs go to those most able to pay (annual $250,000 salary, for instance)
                  1. 10 year deficit neutral, that is over 10 years the savings of the program pays for the costs of the program

                    There are a number of bills out right now andthe Senate Finance Committee is expected to conclude with another.

                    This is OUR discussion and we all need to bepart of it. Here are a few places formore information.

                    In addition, as people of faith we need to beinvolved. Join the phone call hosted by a number of national faith leadersalong with president Obama. To sign up for the call go to:

                    about the writer

                    about the writer

                    pegchemberli

                    More from No Section

                    See More
                    FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
                    Melissa Golden/The New York Times

                    It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.