A few years ago, the good people of the 3000 block of Bloomington Avenue South in Minneapolis were mystified by a steady stream of kids on bikes who kept rolling into a neighbor's driveway. It could have been a bike club, maybe, except for the fact that the kids all arrived on bikes, and then left — sheepishly? — on foot.
OK, the neighbors weren't all that mystified. They called the cops. When the police arrived, according to court documents, they found more than 40 bicycles piled in the house, garage and attic. The registrations on a number of the bikes — surprise — matched those of bikes reported stolen.
The officers that day found what appeared to be a kind of modern-day Fagin — a man, aka a fence, who was sending out children ("juvenile males," according to the complaint) to steal on his behalf. As the case wound through the courts, it proved to be a more mundane and maybe more important window into the dynamics of the city's bike theft business.
The defendant was a 22-year-old man with a drug problem and a laptop who learned that Minneapolis is awash with stolen bikes — and, apparently, if you paid cash, those hot bikes will be delivered to your doorstep, by the dozens, no master plan or complex criminal scheme required.
When police showed up on Bloomington Avenue on that June day and found all those bikes, they read the man his rights and, as his lawyer, David L. McCormick, pointed out: "He fessed up right away."
"Defendant admitted that all the bicycles found at the house and in the garage were obtained from various individuals who stole them and brought them to defendant to sell," reads the original complaint. "Defendant said that he paid $20-$30 for each bicycle and then sold them on Craigslist or other websites. Defendant said that he thought it was OK, as he wasn't the one who stole the bicycles." The complaint added, dryly, "The defendant is in custody."
"He really didn't know what he was doing," McCormick said. "He wasn't scraping serial numbers off the bikes. He didn't know what to do with all of them, but they" — the kids and the bikes — "just kept coming and coming …. He didn't know the difference between a LeMond and a Schwinn."
We are not naming the defendant — he has no other nontraffic criminal record, he met the conditions of his parole (drug testing, court costs, community service), and the felony charge of receiving stolen goods was ultimately dismissed, with time served. He also declined an invitation to talk about his adventures in the Minneapolis bike theft business.