TFD: The great DVR debate -- do you watch games if you already know the winner?

Good times

June 7, 2013 at 9:47PM

Normally we aren't terribly interested in tennis. We like it just fine, and we'll glance with more interest during the major tournaments. But it's not required viewing -- usually.

That said, a friend who is more of a tennis fan is staying at our house for a few days, and we know he recorded the semifinal match in the French Open today between Rafael Nadal and Novak Djokovic. We know how it ended, and we know it was spectacular.

But should we actually take the time to watch a sporting event of which we already know the outcome?

Normally, we say no. It takes away from the enjoyment if the winner is already known. But are some things worth watching regardless?

That is our question to you -- both in general for any sport, and in particular if you happened to watch this specific tennis match.

about the writer

about the writer

Michael Rand

Columnist / Reporter

Michael Rand is the Minnesota Star Tribune's Digital Sports Senior Writer and host/creator of the Daily Delivery podcast. In 25 years covering Minnesota sports at the Minnesota Star Tribune, he has seen just about everything (except, of course, a Vikings Super Bowl).

See Moreicon

More from Sports

See More
card image
Anthony Souffle/The Minnesota Star Tribune

Thielen, a Minnesota native, requested to be waived by the Vikings midseason and closed his 13-year career with the Steelers.

card image
card image