LITTLE FALLS, MINN. - "This case is big. This is Minnesota's Trayvon Martin case," prosecutor Pete Orput said before the Byron Smith murder trial.
Except it never really was.
Unlike the Florida case that became a lightning rod on race and the boundaries of self-defense, the Smith case got national attention but never gained the traction some predicted among gun proponents.
Joe Olson thinks he knows why.
Olson is as big of a gun advocate as you will find. The Hamline University law professor has worked on behalf of gun owners at the Capitol for 25 years and written book chapters on self-defense. Olson is president of Academics for the Second Amendment and once served on the board of directors of the National Rifle Association.
But just before the verdict, I asked Olson about those who say Smith's actions were justified.
"The only one who was really saying that was his lawyer, and he doesn't really have any alternative," Olson said. "It was clearly a bad shooting."
Olson said that "everybody I talk to at the shooting range knows Smith crossed a pretty clear line. [The law] allows a homeowner to stop a felony in the home with deadly force. It does not allow a subsequent murder after the danger has passed. Anyone who has taken a carry permit course in Minnesota knows that."