Teachers are quitting in droves all over the country because they are overburdened, under supported and underpaid. Now we have four Minnesota legislators with no educational background (I checked) sponsoring a bill that adds to teachers' burdens.
The proposed "Minnesota Parents' Bill of Rights" would require teachers to send parents their teaching syllabus two weeks in advance and update it if anything changes ("Bill wants parents informed of studies," front page, Feb. 15). Never mind that Minnesota already has a law allowing parents to come and see any learning materials they wish to see.
As a retired educator, I stopped substituting when teachers were required to teach online two years ago. Since then their plight has only worsened, with mandates to teach in person no matter their health risks, and to be ready to switch to online teaching, depending on COVID numbers, not knowing from week to week how to plan their lessons.
Some parents in the school district where I live, which did not mandate masks, want the teachers to give online instruction to students exposed to COVID, in addition to teaching those in their classrooms. That takes two teachers.
Most teachers have always taken work home, and most use private time on weekends and summers for planning curricula, correcting papers and even going out to purchase needed supplies. They are not paid anything extra for these additional hours.
The proposed law also requires that parents be given a list of all the books in the school libraries. Books are always in a state of flux and new ones come in and others are replaced daily, so many more librarian hours would be needed.
Teachers and schools are tired of being used as political fodder. Is it coincidental that the Minnesota Parents' Bill of Rights is almost identical to similar bills introduced in Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina and West Virginia? We've watched these same politicians use warnings about critical race theory to get parents verbally threatening school boards, banning any books on topics of race or gender, and use other divisive tactics just for their own political gain.
The supposed purpose of the new bill is that it "empowers" parents, telling them that their children have for too long been "mere subjects of the state and belong to 'the system' and not their parents." What?