Bills that would weaken the power of seniority in teacher layoffs saw nearly three hours of debate Thursday in the Senate Education Committee, but in the end received no vote.
Still, the lively discussion included testimony by parents, school board members, a superintendent and even a neuroscience expert brought in by Education Minnesota, the state's teachers union.
The two measures, one already approved by the GOP-led House, would require school districts to consider performance, not only seniority, when laying off teachers because of budget cuts.
Revisions to seniority rules that guide layoffs are a top priority for Republican legislators, but have failed to gain traction in the DFL-led Senate.
Sen. Terri Bonoff of Minnetonka is the sponsor of one of the bills and is the only DFL legislator in favor of revising seniority rules for teachers.
Bonoff and other proponents said the legislation is vital to helping close Minnesota's long-running achievement gaps between white and minority students. She cited a recent California court case in which teacher tenure and seniority-guided layoffs were ruled unconstitutional.
"This is not about keeping young people over old people," Bonoff said. It's about "serving students to the best of our ability … this issue is a matter of civil rights."
For years, Education Minnesota, which represents 70,000 teachers in the state, has vigorously opposed legislation to diminish seniority during layoffs, a process commonly called "last in, first out."