That bread-and-butter promise of municipal politicians — to hold down property taxes — has largely been absent from the mayoral races in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
St. Paul faces an unprecedented 24 percent levy increase in 2018, but the mayoral race has centered on parks and recreation, police-community relations, job growth and the future of the former Ford assembly plant site. Minneapolis faces a 5.5 percent levy increase, but candidates for mayor have focused on policing, racial inequality and affordable housing. Property taxes have barely come up.
"It should have come up more frequently, but it didn't, in forum after forum with the various candidates," said Joe Spartz, president of the Greater St. Paul Building Owners and Managers Association. "The pitchforks aren't out. I think when people start getting their real bills then there's going to be more people grousing."
The mayor, with council approval, sets the property tax levy — the amount of money collected overall — and the county sets the rates to reach that amount. City taxes make up less than half of a homeowner's tax bill, with the school district, county taxes and special taxing districts accounting for the other chunk.
Tax collection has grown, on average, by 3.2 percent annually in Minneapolis over the past four years, but that hasn't always meant higher bills. The city has issued more than $1 billion in construction permits each of the past five years, and all that new tax base means the levy can go up without causing increases in property tax bills.
"This is just a good time to be a mayor or a council member because you've got this expanding tax base," said Jay Kiedrowski, a fellow at the Humphrey School and former budget official in Minneapolis and at the state level. "I'm a resident of the city, and I haven't seen any appreciable increase in my taxes, and I think that's generally the case."
Unprecedented increase
In St. Paul, the major levy increase comes in response to a Minnesota Supreme Court ruling last summer that determined the city could no longer charge right-of-way assessments to all properties, including those that are tax-exempt.
The court decided those charges were taxes and not fees, as the city claimed.