Five women are suing The Nature Conservancy and a former associate director of the Minneapolis-based regional chapter alleging that he altered photos of them while on work assignments to make them sexual in nature, then posted them on social media.
The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court last week alleges years of sexual harassment and discrimination by Douglas Shaw while he worked for the global environmental nonprofit. It seeks an unspecified monetary amount for emotional distress, damage to reputations, punitive damages, lost wages and expenses related to the legal action.
Christopher Anderson, regional marketing director for The Nature Conservancy (TNC), said in a statement that “as soon as we became aware of his actions, we terminated him within 24 hours. ... Mr. Shaw violated our code of conduct.”
A national spokesperson for the group said in a statement that it “vehemently denies liability and the allegations against TNC set forth in the complaint. TNC did not know what Mr. Shaw was doing in his personal time on his personal accounts, but when it did, it took immediate action by terminating his employment within 24 hours of becoming aware of it. TNC will be defending itself on all fronts. ... As demonstrated by Mr. Shaw’s immediate termination, TNC is committed to promptly remedying any improper conduct that may violate TNC’s Code of Conduct.”
A message was left for Shaw on Monday at his Wild Birds Unlimited retail outlet in Woodbury. Court records do not list attorneys for either defendant.
The Nature Conservancy is considered one of the country’s most venerable environmental groups. It focuses on protecting land and waters, promoting sustainable food and water and climate action.
According to the lawsuit, Shaw routinely took photos of the women — identified in the suit only as Jane Does 1 through 5 — at the encouragement of the conservancy while they were on work-related trips or events. After becoming friends on social media, he used photos from their pages.
In multiple instances when Shaw posted the photos on social media, the lawsuit said, “he altered the photos to make them sexual in nature and/or create[d] ‘deepfake’ explicit sexual images” that depicted them naked or involved in sex acts. Deepfake refers to the process of altering images in ways that appear convincing.