In these times of growing concern about energy consumption, its cost and its impact on the environment, Twin Cities suburbs are being urged to look beyond street-lighting options offered by Xcel Energy to find new and more efficient lighting solutions.
A new study on municipal street-lighting suggests that suburbs start planning now to replace aging lights over the next few years and that they consider companies other than Xcel Energy to do the work.
Although utility regulations require that the cities buy electric power from Xcel, the energy company does not have a monopoly on the sale of poles, lights and maintenance services. Nevertheless, Xcel provides and maintains most of the streetlights in the metro area under 25-year contracts.
Xcel Energy's manager of outdoor lighting, Bob Schommer, said the company plans to stay in the street-lighting business and would like to renew current contracts with new 25-year agreements. Cities can count on Xcel to be around for the long term, he said.
But a report prepared for the Suburban Rate Authority -- an alliance that represents 31 Twin Cities suburbs -- says cities should consider alternatives to current street-lighting and maintenance services provided by Xcel Energy.
"Several new lighting technologies are emerging and merit consideration for improved quality of light, decreased frequency of outages and energy efficiency," the report says.
The Rate Authority is urging cities to get more involved in managing their streetlight systems, saying that if they rely on Xcel to do it all, they cannot expect the best service.
Many cities soon will be facing the replacement of streetlights installed 25 to 35 years ago, and what they want to know is "what should we be putting in to replace them?" said Gary Brown, director of engineering and building inspection for Brooklyn Park. The message from the report, said Brown, is to consider options. "Don't just plunge ahead."