"Make it go away."
How many times have you said or thought that? (The list of potential subjects would seem inexhaustible.) And how many times has your wish come true without effort or compromise?
Still, there are some kinds of unburdening we usually can take for granted. For instance, when city dwellers put out their garbage at the appointed time and place, nice people with big trucks come and, well, make it go away.
Or, more specifically, take it somewhere else. Like to a landfill or an incinerator. Because both solutions pose environmental risks, this doesn't really rid us of our problem, even if an immediate need has been met.
Which you know, and which you perhaps disapprove of. So maybe you've made a determined household effort to sort out recyclable materials or even compost your food waste. If so, good on you. As a recent Star Tribune article reported, nearly half of the waste generated in the Twin Cities area as of a couple of years ago can be counted as recycled in one way or another.
Which is pretty good, but not enough.
It's good because it's an improvement. It was about 30% a decade ago. The recycling of organic material — composting — explains much of the gain.
It's insufficient because the demand for places to put waste is still growing. Landfills are buried at the bottom of the list of preferred options in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's "waste hierarchy," but the agency is considering four requests for expansion in the southern Twin Cities suburbs. Any approval would be the first in 16 years. There may not be an immediate alternative. The metro area's incinerators are running at capacity, and some of the easier gains in recycling have already been made.