ST. PAUL, Minn. — A legislator wants a chunk of the collapsed interstate bridge to remind him of the dangers of neglected infrastructure. Survivors have sought the crumpled steel as mementos of that deadly day in Minneapolis six years ago on Thursday. Civil engineering instructors and historians see value in the wreckage, too.
In a few weeks, Minnesota Department of Transportation officials will begin parceling out tons of steel from the Interstate 35W bridge, which collapsed during rush hour on Aug. 1, 2007, killing 13 people and injuring 145 others.
Some nine million pounds of rusting, lime-green steel are spread across two storage facilities, and it will be distributed under a law approved this spring. Whatever isn't claimed by Thanksgiving will be sold for scrap, potentially netting more than $500,000.
It's a closing chapter in a saga that began when the busy eight-lane bridge suddenly buckled on a muggy evening, sending dozens of vehicles crashing into the Mississippi River and each other, and stirring ripples of worry about the nation's aging infrastructure. Investigators blamed a design flaw that was exacerbated by extra weight from a resurfacing project.
"Anybody who was on that bridge when it fell or had family on that bridge when it fell will get some steel if they want," MnDOT spokesman Kevin Gutknecht said.
State Bridge Engineer Nancy Daubenberger wrote to collapse survivors and victims' families in May to inquire about interest in obtaining salvaged bridge parts. She said Wednesday that 30 to 40 people have stepped forward so far to ask to reserve about 75 pieces.
When distribution starts in late August or early September, people can choose among bolts the size of a pen or opt for larger hunks, including some a couple feet long that weigh as much as 100 pounds. They will get them free of charge, but they must retrieve them and sign a liability waiver given sharp edges and lead-based paint.
One collapse survivor, Brent Olson, first approached state officials years ago about letting those affected by the tragedy have a chance to claim bridge parts. He was told he'd have to wait for the lawsuits to conclude because the old bridge was considered evidence in a possible trial.