State, law firm seek review of 3M case decision

July 27, 2013 at 10:41PM

The Minnesota Attorney General's Office and the Washington, D.C.-based Covington & Burling law firm are asking the Minnesota Supreme Court to review an appellate court decision disqualifying the state's legal team in its feud with 3M Co. over alleged damages from PFCs in the east-metro area.

The high court's decision on whether to review the Court of Appeals ruling could come as soon as this week.

In its July 1 decision, the Court of Appeals upheld the disqualification of Covington & Burling for violating professional rules of conduct in failing to properly notify 3M that it was representing the state in a lawsuit over perfluorochemicals that were legally dumped in Washington County.

Covington & Burling previously had represented 3M on PFC-related matters before taking the state's case in 2010 on the opposing legal side, creating a conflict of interest, the appellate court ruled.

The law firm took the state's case at no cost in exchange for a percentage of any potential settlement.

jim anderson

@StribJAnderson

about the writer

about the writer

More from No Section

See More
FILE -- A rent deposit slot at an apartment complex in Tucker, Ga., on July 21, 2020. As an eviction crisis has seemed increasingly likely this summer, everyone in the housing market has made the same plea to Washington: Send money — lots of it — that would keep renters in their homes and landlords afloat. (Melissa Golden/The New York Times) ORG XMIT: XNYT58
Melissa Golden/The New York Times

It’s too soon to tell how much the immigration crackdown is to blame.