Even as they descended on the State Capitol to plead their case for being spared from looming budget cuts, local government officials got some bad news Wednesday: Things are likely to get worse, and the targets on their back may get larger.
State economist Tom Stinson told legislators that the $426 million deficit projected through the end of the current fiscal year, concluding June 30, could increase by $30 million to $70 million in light of new, higher national unemployment numbers.
At a pair of hearings, mayors and other officials described the potential cuts they are facing as "an economic crisis," particularly as they may come with only weeks left in their own budget years, leaving them little time to adjust.
In dire scenarios, local leaders lined up to document the potential repercussions: Rochester would have to take down its police gang unit and use the six to eight officers to fill other duties. The 100 residents of Arco on the South Dakota border could lose their fire department. Maple Plain might be unable to make debt payments on a new water treatment plant. Without its expected $2.1 million state aid December payment, Brainerd will have $5,329 in such aid left in the bank. Williams, population 270 in northern Minnesota, might have to lock the doors on its City Hall if a $22,000 payment doesn't come through.
Gov. Tim Pawlenty has strongly suggested he will slice into aid programs to local government to wipe out the short-term $426 million deficit. Later this month, cities are scheduled to receive $280 million in state aid. Counties are expecting $165 million. Those revenues, which come twice a year, are used for everything from sewer improvements to putting cops on the street. They account for about one-half to two-thirds of most cities' total budgets, according to the Minnesota House Research Department. And for many cities and counties, the money has already been committed.
Future none too rosey
In addition to the immediate shortfall, the state faces an even more daunting $4.8 billion deficit projected for the two-year period from July 2009 to June 2011, and cities and counties are in the cross-hairs there as well.
Doing the math, local officials fear they will be forced to absorb all of the near-term cuts, which Pawlenty can make unilaterally in a process known as unallotment. The governor's office and legislative leaders met Wednesday to discuss how the process might work and when it might begin, possibly before Christmas.