St. Paul property owners have filed new appeals in a legal battle that has already forced the city to raise taxes to pay for street maintenance.
The owners of seven St. Paul buildings are challenging assessments charged for seal coating and mill and overlay work in 2019 and 2020. They say such services benefit the entire city, so property owners shouldn't have to foot the bill for the upkeep, which is at least partly funded by fees based on how much of their land abuts the street.
The challenges — laid out in separate appeals filed by two attorneys — echo arguments of a previous case against St. Paul that went to the Minnesota Supreme Court in 2016.
In a ruling then, a judge wrote that the city's assessments were taxes, not fees, as the city argued. That sent St. Paul scrambling to find a way to fund more than $30 million in street maintenance services and ultimately resulted in a 20% property tax increase in 2018.
State law says cities can charge assessments to fund public improvements if the assessed property owners get a special benefit. That benefit — measured by how much the property value increases — must be equal or greater than the charged fee.
The concept is at the crux of the new lawsuit filed June 11 by attorney Ferdinand Peters on behalf of Factory Lane LLC, Northern Pacific Railway Co., Soo Line Railroad Co. and others. Peters writes that seal coating services — which St. Paul performs on residential streets every eight years — "are expected in any well-run city."
"No prospective purchaser would pay more for Plaintiffs' properties merely because the city maintains the streets," Peters wrote. The Ramsey County Assessor's Office does not recognize an increase in value associated with the work, he added.
On June 18, attorney Kelly Hadac filed a similar lawsuit taking issue with St. Paul's mill and overlay projects, which repave the city's commercial and arterial streets every 10 years.