High above the emerging St. Croix River bridge, 14 cranes dot the sky. Concrete roadway segments, rounded like pieces of giant cereal bowls, are lined up in rows on shore. Taut cables stretch from two of the five towering piers, supporting an ever-lengthening driving surface. Even with many parts yet to be put in place, a finished bridge is not hard to envision.
But as winter approaches, uncertainty lingers over when the bridge will open and whether it will cost more to complete.
Engineers and contractors will huddle in December to discuss concerns with a structure that spans a federally protected wild and scenic river and is now more than half finished. Delays over the past year — associated with problems installing complex webs of metal framing and other challenges unique to a cable-strung bridge — led to a decision in August to scrub the original late 2016 opening.
"It's a complex project with lots of pieces that go together. You can't jump ahead one step until the previous step is completed. That's really what's controlling the speed of bridge construction," Michael Beer, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) engineer overseeing the project, said last week.
The bridge is the largest component of a joint Minnesota-Wisconsin undertaking that eventually will reroute interstate traffic from the Stillwater Lift Bridge, 2 miles to the north, to Oak Park Heights. Budgeted to cost as much as $676 million, the overall project includes new approach highways, historic and cultural preservations and environmental protections for the St. Croix River. Much of the work on land in both states, especially the scheduled opening of a new four-lane connecting highway in Wisconsin, waits for a finished bridge.
Problems with installing metalwork — the rebar webbing that holds concrete together — significantly delayed the construction schedule this year and led to allegations by the original contractor, J&L Steel of Hudson, Wis., that designs were flawed. The company's owner, LouAnne Berg, said she had raised concerns nearly a year before MnDOT and the general contractor, Lunda-Ames, admitted publicly that the planned completion date couldn't be met.
In response, Beer and Lunda-Ames spokesman Brent Wilber disputed the timing and said the number of design problems wasn't unusual for such a large bridge.
Beer said again last week that building a cable-strung bridge, rare in its design, presents challenges that are being overcome with experience. But he also acknowledged delays and said the bridge, 60 percent complete, should have been closer to 70 percent finished by now.