A week from Tuesday, South St. Paul residents will decide whether they are ready to pay an average of $8 a month to give the city's parks and recreation facilities an overhaul.
The city is asking voters to approve a plan to remodel its 51-year-old ice arena, build new sports fields, and turn 87 open acres along the Mississippi River into a hallmark park with baseball and softball fields as well as non-sports recreation like a performing arts building and areas for playgrounds, picnics, and taking in the views of the river.
The referendum, which would allow the purchase of $10 million in bonds, would cost $98 a year, or about $8 a month, for the owner of a home valued at $150,000. The redevelopment of McMorrow Field, Wakota Civic Arena and Kaposia Landing, the former landfill along the bank of the river, were identified as the top priorities in a January 2013 survey commissioned by the city, said Parks and Recreation Director Chris Esser.
The city waited several years to put the referendum to voters, Esser said, until the effects of the recession softened. At the same time, he said, interest rates are still low, making now a good time to issue the bonds.
Availability of land is also a factor. Esser said that as a first-ring suburb, South St. Paul doesn't have surplus land to buy up for new parks. Instead it needs to redevelop land to fit patterns of how people use it. Youth football and soccer are becoming more popular, he said, but all the major ball sports, including softball and baseball for adults and children, have a problem with lack of fields. Teams often schedule "away" games just to give other teams an opportunity to practice on South St. Paul's fields, he said.
Esser also said that for 23 years, the city's parks have done without the bond funding that a big expansion of a parks system needs.
"I was in high school in 1990," he said of the city's last referendum, which funded the city's splash pool. Since then, residents have voted down the only referendum, which forced the closure of an outdoor pool.
But in the January survey, residents were lukewarm on the idea of the bond proposal: 50 percent were in favor, 41 percent opposed and 9 percent undecided. That was enough to prompt the city to delay the referendum, which could have been held in May.